Authors
Manikanta Kollipara
Abstract
Archaeology is considered as a vicious process, which includes the precise thorough site record which is imperative. At the time of exploration of a site, the documentation is required that helps in recreating and understanding the site. Pipeline of 3D modelling can help the archaeologists in a detailed thorough documentation process by constructing geometrically perfect 3D model of the site. The process of modelling initiates with the acquisition of data and ends the process using urbane visualization device that is utilized by researchers and scholars for the purpose of exploring and understanding the site. The whole documentation workflow is carried out using digital tools, accuracy and interoperability. This paper discusses the 3D modelling technique which is used for the recording of archaeological excavation and what type of processes are used in this technique. Keywords: Archaeological excavation, 3D modelling recording, geometric modelling
Introduction
The process of archaeology is basically comprises of various steps such as excavation, archaeological survey, analysis and then the interpretation. At the time of excavation, the archaeological interpretation and the carried out research depends on the collection of data accurately (Paulo et al, 2014). As according to the studies of various researchers, archaeology is a vicious practice in which the spot analysis necessitates the structure disassembling, displacement and removal of all the findings that includes tools, bones and pottery. So, it becomes vital to preserve every exact detail of place while it is being unearthed (Allen et al, 2004). In archaeology, the phase of documentation is considered as crucial since the excavations are usually removed from most of the discovered features. First, traditional methods were in use which were majorly manual and they also includes the knowledge about the surveyed object but they consume much of the time and lacks the geometric accuracy. There is one other approach i.e., paper based documentation that provides 2D outputs (Valente et al, 2017). As the three dimensional technique is used in archaeology and from its early time, terrestrial photogrammetry techniques and Computer Aided Design (CAD) is used for the purpose of recording old buildings. For the visualization of archaeological sites or landscapes, Digital Elevation Models (DEM’S) is used whereas for cost surface and viewshed analysis, Geographical Information System is used (https://proceedings.caaconference.org/files/2000/01_Avern_CAA_2000.pdf).
With the increase in usage of more flexible measurements in field work by archaeologists, they should be able to acquire their own measurements in a simple and easy way. The Image based 3D approach of recording offers several kinds of possibilities. After the development of 3D models, Archaeologists use that 3D model for measurement and visualization purposes (Pollefeys, 2003).
3D Modeling – A number of research teams are using a variety of scans and images that develop 3D models for a purpose of simulated representation of historical spots. Certain projects basically involve the modelling of Michelangelo’s David, the IBM pieta projects, the Great Buddha project and virtualization of a Byzantine Crypt. In this, archaeological excavation is recorded which is in progress, then track the variations as the mining and digging process proceeds. The final step is that these replicas aid as a counterpart to documentation. Archaeologists majorly uses photogrammetry in place of range data from laser than scans to create a 3D replica. Pollefeys et al, addresses the image based reconstruction for archaeology.
Visualization – Currently archaeologists uses different types of documentation (handwritten), sketch drafts, illustrations and pictures which are later used to document the physical condition of an excavated archaeological site. The documentation process also involves the standard guidelines that are developed especially for this purpose. Both the techniques GIS and CAD consist 3D visualization proficiencies that presents as layered 2D maps or abrasive geographical terrain maps with implanted entities, pictures as well as sketches. Some of the research groups such as ARCHAVE project that is developed for the purpose of use in CAVE like environment having projected walls and floor. This project comprises of humanly displayed atmosphere having simulated portraits that represents innumerable type of finds and has also been sometimes utilized to determine designs and fashions present on the project located on to the site. In divergence whereas, highly detailed computer generated model is used by this system that contains textures of high resolution, exact exemplification of the actual excavated site. Gaitatzes et al, stated the simulated veracity environments for the temple visualization and civic constructions of an ancient Greece (Allen, 2004).
References
Allen, P, et al. “Seeing into the Past: Creating a 3D Modeling Pipeline for Archaeological Visualization.” 2nd Intl Symp 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission, IEEE, 2004, www.cs.columbia.edu/~allen/PAPERS/3dpvt04.1.pdf .
Avern, Geoffrey John. “A New Technique for Recording Archaeological Excavations: Research Progress Report.” 2000, pp. 3–7., proceedings.caaconference.org/files/2000/01_Avern_CAA_2000.pdf.
Barsanti, Sara Gonizzi, et al. “Photogrammetry and Laser Scanning for Archaeological Site 3D Modeling - Some Critical Issues.” Https://Pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a7a9/bc732b5dd2d0ca3da138677b72531fb66f65.Pdf, pp. 1–10., pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a7a9/bc732b5dd2d0ca3da138677b72531fb66f65.pdf.
Bernardes, Paulo, et al. “Image-Based 3D Modelling in Archaeology: Application and Evaluation.” WSCG 2014 Conference on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision, 2014, pp. 159–166., dspace5.zcu.cz/bitstream/11025/11925/1/Bernardes.pdf.
Fock, Sebastian M. T Seibert von, et al. “Pipeline for Reconstruction and Visualization of Underwater Archaeology Sites Using Photogrammetry.” 2017, www.hmc.edu/lair/publications/2017/cata_2017.pdf .
Gool, Luc Van, et al. “The MURALE Project: Image-Based 3D Modeling for Archaeology.” www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/pomarc/pubs/VanGoolRS04.pdf .
Lambers, Karsten, and Fabio Remondino. “Optical 3D Measurement Techniques in Archaeology: Recent Developments and Applications.” Konstanzer Online Publications System, 2008, pp. 27–35.,f-origin.hypotheses.org/wp content/blogs.dir/3124/files/2016/02/Optical_3D_Measurement_Techniques_in_Arc.pdf.
Manferdini, Anna Maria, et al. “3D MODELING AND SEMANTIC CLASSIFICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDS FOR MANAGEMENT AND VISUALIZATION IN 3D ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASES.” 2008, pp. 1–8., 3dom.fbk.eu/sites/3dom.fbk.eu/files/pdf/VSMM2008_semantic.pdf.
Niknami , Kamal Aldin, and Zahra Mirashe. “3D Tools for Scientific Visualization and Documentation of Archaeological Heritage Case Study: A Sassanid Shrine of Daregaz, Northeastern Iran.” XXI International CIPA Symposium, Jan. 10AD, www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVI/5-C53/papers/FP106.pdf.
Pollefeys, Marc, et al. “3D Recording for Archaeological Fieldwork.” IEEE Computer Society, 2003, pp. 2–9., www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/pomarc/pubs/PollefeysCGA03.pdf.
Skarlatos, D, et al. “AN ‘OPEN’ METHOD FOR 3D MODELLING AND MAPPING IN UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES.” 2012, pp. 1–9., www.ucy.ac.cy/marelab/documents/Mazotos/Anaskafi/Publications_/Skarlatos_Demesticha_Kyparissi_2012.pdf.
How to cite this article?
APA Style | Kollipara, M. (2019). Study on 3D Modelling Technique for recording archaeological excavation. Academic Journal of Archaeological Studies, 1(1), 1-5. |
Chicago Style | |
MLA Style | |
DOI | |
URL |