Authors
Sameeksha Dubey, Anjali
Abstract
Forensic proteomics is a cutting-edge science that uses extensive protein analysis to handle various forensic difficulties, complementing traditional DNA-based approaches. Proteins' stability and abundance in biological samples make them important when DNA evidence is deteriorated, tainted, or inadequate. Advanced mass spectrometry methods make it easier to identify and characterize proteins and their post-translational changes, revealing important information about the biological condition and identity of persons engaged in criminal investigations.Proteomic analysis has several forensic uses, including identifying human remains, estimating post-mortem periods, and determining the reason and manner of death. Proteins taken from bones, teeth, and hair can provide valuable information about a person's age, gender, and perhaps lineage. Furthermore, examining protein breakdown patterns helps to estimate the period after death, which is an important component in forensic investigations. In violent crime cases, proteomic techniques may detect blood, sperm, saliva, and other body fluids, even in tiny amounts, using unique protein markers. Forensic proteomics also covers the examination of non-human proteins, which is essential in wildlife forensics and identifying animal species involved in illegal trade and poaching incidents.The resilience of proteins under varied environmental circumstances enables the examination of material exposed to hostile environments, increasing the scope of forensic investigations. Despite its intriguing premise, forensic proteomics confronts several hurdles, including the need for standardized techniques, large protein databases, and powerful bioinformatics tools for data analysis. Continued advances in mass spectrometry, sample preparation, and computer analysis are critical for overcoming these barriers and incorporating proteomics into standard forensic practice. Keywords: forensic proteomics, mass spectrometry, computational analysis, post-translational modifications
Introduction
DNA analysis has long been regarded as the gold standard in forensic science for identifying individuals and resolving crimes. However, sample deterioration, contamination, or insufficient quantity may limit the use of DNA alone in some circumstances. To address these issues and improve the robustness of forensic investigations, forensic proteomics has emerged as a valuable additional technique (Ballou et al., 2013). Proteins, which are essential for organisms' biological processes, are usually more stable and plentiful in biological samples than DNA (Kontopoulos, et al., 2020). Proteins are extremely useful in forensic investigations because of their stability, especially when DNA integrity is impaired. Forensic proteomics uses modern mass spectrometry methods to provide a thorough profile and identification of proteins and their post-translational changes. These alterations can provide important information about a person's biological condition, the period since death, and the presence of certain physiological fluids at crime scenes. Furthermore, forensic proteomics is not restricted to human materials. It includes wildlife forensics, which helps identify animal species engaged in illegal trade and poaching. The capacity to examine proteins in various situations broadens the toolset accessible to forensic investigators, allowing them to identify human remains, estimate post-mortem periods, and determine causes and ways of death. As forensic science advances, the incorporation of proteomics has the potential to dramatically improve the accuracy and reliability of forensic investigations. By supplementing DNA evidence with specific protein profiles and alterations, forensic proteomics provides a more complete and nuanced approach to criminal investigation, eventually improving the pursuit of justice.
In the early twentieth century, forensic investigators began to investigate the use of protein-based approaches for identifying biological material. One of the first strategies involves using immunological tests to identify blood and other biological fluids at crime scenes. The precipitin test was very effective in distinguishing between human and animal blood, providing critical evidence in criminal trials.
Today, Forensic proteomics, a rapidly growing subject in forensic science, uses extensive protein analysis to answer challenging forensic issues. Unlike DNA, proteins are more durable and plentiful in biological samples, making them useful when DNA is destroyed, contaminated, or inadequate. This discipline uses modern mass spectrometry techniques to detect and describe proteins and their post-translational changes, giving crucial information about a person's biological condition and identity in criminal investigations. Proteomic analysis has several forensic uses. It can help identify human remains, estimate post-mortem periods, and ascertain reasons and modes of death. For example, proteins isolated from bones, teeth, and hair can indicate a person's age, gender, and even lineage.
Forensic proteomics goes beyond human biology. It includes wildlife forensics, which is critical for identifying animal species implicated in illegal trade and poaching. Proteins' resistance to varied environmental conditions enables the study of materials exposed to hostile environments, increasing the scope of forensic investigations.
References
Aebersold, Ruedi, et al. “How Many Human Proteoforms Are There?” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 14, no. 3, Feb. 2018, pp. 206–14.
Ballou, Susan, et al. The Biological Evidence Preservation Handbook : Best Practices for Evidence Handlers ; Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation. 1 Apr. 2013.
Butler, John M. Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology. Academic Press, 2011.
Divall, Graham B. “The Application of Electrophoretic Techniques in the Field of Criminology.” Electrophoresis, vol. 6, no. 6, Jan. 1985, pp. 249–58.
Duong, Van-An, et al. “Proteomics in Forensic Analysis: Applications for Human Samples.” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 8, Apr. 2021, p. 3393.
Kontopoulos, Ioannis, et al. “Screening Archaeological Bone for Palaeogenetic and Palaeoproteomic Studies.” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 6, June 2020, p. e0235146.
Kulak, Nils A., et al. “Minimal, Encapsulated Proteomic-sample Processing Applied to Copy-number Estimation in Eukaryotic Cells.” Nature Methods, vol. 11, no. 3, Feb. 2014, pp. 319–24.
Legg, Kevin M., et al. “Verification of Protein Biomarker Specificity for the Identification of Biological Stains by Quadrupole Time‐of‐flight Mass Spectrometry.” Electrophoresis, vol. 38, no. 6, Dec. 2016, pp. 833–45.
Michalski, Annette, et al. “More Than 100,000 Detectable Peptide Species Elute in Single Shotgun Proteomics Runs but the Majority Is Inaccessible to Data-Dependent LC−MS/MS.” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 10, no. 4, Feb. 2011, pp. 1785–93.
Sensabaugh, G. “Serology: Overview.” Elsevier eBooks, 2015, pp. 254–66.
Watkins, Winifred M., and W. T. J. Morgan. “Possible Genetical Pathways for the Biosynthesis of Blood Group Mucopolysaccharides.” Vox Sanguinis, vol. 4, no. 2, Mar. 1959, pp. 97–119.
Wilson, Steven Ray, et al. “Nano-LC in Proteomics: Recent Advances and Approaches.” Bioanalysis, vol. 7, no. 14, Aug. 2015, pp. 1799–815.
Yang, Heyi, et al. “Body Fluid Identification by Mass Spectrometry.” International Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 127, no. 6, Mar. 2013, pp. 1065–77.
Franklin, Rachel N., et al. “Proteomic Genotyping: Using Mass Spectrometry to Infer SNP Genotypes in Pigmented and Non-pigmented Hair.” Forensic Science International, vol. 310, Feb. 2020, p. 110200.
Welker, F. “Elucidation of Cross-species Proteomic Effects in Human and Hominin Bone Proteome Identification Through a Bioinformatics Experiment.” BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, Feb. 2018.
Oonk, Stijn, et al. “Proteomics as a New Tool to Study Fingermark Ageing in Forensics.” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, Oct. 2018.
How to cite this article?
APA Style | Dubey, S., & Anjali. (2024). STR Markers: Pioneering Advances in Forensic Science and Genetic Research. Academic Journal of Forensic Sciences, 07(02), 27–33. |
Chicago Style | |
MLA Style | |
DOI | |
URL |