Introduction

There are many big questions about the right of men: does a man have a right to live, and have a right to die? Does he have a right to a noble death? Is the ending of life caused on the ground of mercy reasons a crime or unpunishable act? These questions’ answers are different from country to country. Every country has their own rules and regulations. For example; if one country makes the deprivation of life as legal, the reason behind this legality is raised. In the same way, if any country does not legalize it, they must also have the reason behind it. Hence, Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide became infinite topics for the consideration in the field of medicine, law, sociology, philosophy, religion, and morality. By knowing the definition of these two terms, it can be pointed out that Euthanasia is a medical act directed at the ending of life. Whereas in case of PAS, the physician provides a medication to the patient for taking life.

It is unknown when was the idea of euthanasia came into existence? On this topic, many discussions have been attempted in the United States and the United Kingdom in 1906 at the time of passing a law to legalize Euthanasia by Ohio. The legalization of Euthanasia and PAS began from last few decades but it can be noticed that various representative accepted PAS as a milder form of the ending of life across the world. American continent is a primary evidence where PAS is accepted while the Supreme Court does not have a constitutional right for Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide and don’t ban these acts. In the same way, there should not be any penalties for the persons who aid in the deprivation of life of patients who want to end his life at request (Banovic, Turanjanin, 2016).