Authors
Lekshmi Das
Abstract
Forensic facial reconstruction is a quick, non – destructive and well organized technique. It can be used to find unspecified human corpse when other techniques not succeed. The techniques has been of two types 2D and 3D. Facial reconstruction visual recognition by the respective family and companions to become simple and more specific. It can be utilized as a dominant forensic tool which may support in facial examination of the skull and eventually lead to positive recognition of an individuals. Forensic facial reconstruction is an association of both technical methods and creative skull. It can be applied to reconstruct the soft tissues onto the skull with the aim of acquire the image of an individual for his/her identification and determination. It has been employed in both forensic science and Archaeology. The 3D manual techniques used in forensic facial reconstruction are the Anatomical(Russian), Anthropometrical(American) and Combination Manchester (British) methods which are organized by the scientists namely Gerasimov, Krogman and Neave. Forensic facial reconstruction methods which is constructed using the TCL/Tk scripting language, the latter marking use of the C3D system. Keywords: Forensic facial reconstruction, 3D methods, identification.
Introduction
The uncovering of skeletalised decomposed or badly disfigured remains where specification is unrevealed and not impressed to belong to a individual person leaves the examiner with very little to associate with personal determination. In such cases one is restricted to the common features of the determination such as age, sex, race, stature and build. The purpose such reconstruction is to activate the identification process to see even if a name can be applied to a face. It is not declared that a reconstruction will provide an exact similarity of the person during life. A number of rightness studies using traditional 3D manual methods have indicate good levels of similarity to the pointed faces. Firstly considerable enquiries are made and documents of missing persons carefully analyzed. If it has not been practicable to determine the corpse when the usual path have been take a look at, then the feasibility of the reconstruction of the face from skull is observed (Gupta et al., 2015; Wilkinson & Caroline, 2010).
References
Aulsebrook, W. A. “FACIAL IDENTIFICATION | Facial Tissue Thickness in Facial Reconstruction.” Elsevier eBooks, 2000, pp. 779–88.
Facial Reconstruction | Forensic Science.” Encyclopedia Britannica, www.britannica.com/science/facial-reconstruction.
Gupta, Sonia et al. “Forensic Facial Reconstruction: The Final Frontier.” Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR vol. 9,9 (2015): ZE26-8.
Lee, Won Joon, et al. “An Accuracy Assessment of Forensic Computerized Facial Reconstruction Employing Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography From Live Subjects.” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 57, no. 2, Nov. 2011, pp. 318–27.
Wilkinson, Caroline. “Facial reconstruction--anatomical art or artistic anatomy?.” Journal of anatomy vol. 216,2 (2010): 235-50.
How to cite this article?
APA Style | Das, Lekshmi. Forensic Facial Reconstruction Using 3-D Computer Graphics. Academic Journal of Anthropological Studies, 06(02), 1–4. |
Chicago Style | |
MLA Style | |
DOI | |
URL |