Authors
Hashakimana Clare , Dr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Mahesh Sharma, Afreen Tarannum
Abstract
Currently, numerous tools are used to create forged documents and forgers are successfully making the fabricated documents with these tools. Photocopier is one of such tool often used to reproduce the original documents; therefore the document examiners must find some empirical method to prove the authenticity of the documents in the court. In this paper, a comparative study has been done to compare the original with photocopied colored and black and white handwritten documents irrespective of the ink for all possible striking features. Stereo microscope gives a 3-dimensional view of the strokes and in this paper an effort has been made to compare the handwriting present on the original document and photocopied document irrespective of the ink and paper used with the aid of stereo microscope to differentiate whether the document is original or photocopied. Keywords: Photocopied Document, Colored Document, Stereo microscope
Introduction
Forensic Document Examiners often receive photocopies (monochrome and color copy) for examinations because they can easily be obtained and transported or when the original documents no longer exist. Photocopied documents can be examined accurately and a conclusive opinion made. In the absence of the original document, a first generation copy (first copy of the original document) is preferred to a copy of a copy (copy of multiple iterations).
The estimations analyzed in the forensic examination of handwriting and document frequently turning point on features that are large in significance but found small in size small. The examiner commit to observe evaluate and record the evidence. The estimation of evidence appeals upon experience, knowledge and decision of the examiner, but also, to understand as well as record it for which the examiner desires tools. The utmost significant instrument an examiner of document has, apart from his or her own preliminary examination and thought procedure and that tool stated as the microscope which helps for the purpose of to understand and record moreover the obvious to the unassisted eye (Will, 2000).
Black, 1952 published an article on the microscope in document examination. He wrote that the microscope is no doubt the most widely used optical research instrument. In recent decades the microscope has added its important contribution to the administration of justice, specifically through its application to the examination and interpretation of physical evidence and the presentation of the findings in court. The significance of the microscope has been well exploited in the field of questioned documents in the identification of handwriting, analysis of paper and inks, typewriting and other elements of documents.
Black, 1952 further described microscope as one of the instrument which found it possible to understand the physical evidence on documents which would or else endure imperceptible and impractical. The average unaided human eye can distinguish only 250 separate lines to the inch. This can be better understand that any less details which include separations as well as dimension of less than 1/250th of an inch are misplaced to the eye, which sees them as a connected, solid mass. These small details are often of utmost importance in the determination of questions respecting the authenticity or spuriousness of documents. The evidence of the microscope is conclusive and irrefutable. The microscope has therefore become indispensable to the examiner of questioned documents.
The stereo-microscope provides a 3-dimensional view of an area of interest. In document examination, the Stereo microscope is applied in sequencing of strokes, detection of additions and alterations in holographic wills, ink analysis and determining pen used, , paper fiber analysis, assessment of depth where an ink line crosses a fold in the paper, demonstrating evidence in court, assessment of tremor in simulated forgeries, the unnatural retouching or patching; pen lifts, irregular ink distribution -characteristic of forged signatures which to the unaided eye may appear to be naturally written, and ink line morphology. Where a problem involving differences of color or depth of vision is concerned, the microscope may often be utilized to better effect than photographic demonstrations. In a probate trial the author was able to show the judge through the use of the microscope that three different shades of blue ink were involved in the fraudulent change of the date of a holographic will, the effect of which would have been to invalidate an actually later genuine will. The document was denied probate (Black, 1952).
References
David A. Black, The Microscope in Document Examination, 42 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 810 (1951-1952)
GA Dawson and BS Lindblom; An evaluation of line quality in photocopied signatures; Canada Science & Justice 1998
Jagjeet Singh Saroa1, Komal Saini2. Physical examination of Photocopied documents. Problems of Forensic Sciences 2013, vol. 94, 485–501
Jan Seaman Kelly, Brian S. Lindblom, Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents, Second Edition, 2006 edition.
K Saini, A. Singh. The Evaluation of Handwriting Features in Photocopied Signatures. The Internet Journal of Forensic Science. 2008, Vol 4, no. 1.
Katherine M. Koppenhaver, Photocopies Versus Originals, CFDE, The Scientific Journal of the International Association of Document Examiners, Spring 2015, Vol 1
Koppenhaver Katherine, Attorney's guide to document examination, 2002
Wilmer Souder, Composition, Properties and Behavior of Ball Pens and Inks, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1955, Vol 45, no. 6
How to cite this article?
APA Style | Clare, H. et al. (2019). December Comparative Study of Original, Photocopy and Colored Copy of Handwritten Documents Using a Stereo Microscope. Academic Journal of Forensic Sciences, 02(01), 01-07. |
Chicago Style | |
MLA Style | |
DOI | |
URL |